PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.48%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-16.49%
Negative gross profit growth while PAAS is at 314.88%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-22.71%
Negative EBIT growth while PAAS is at 105.19%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-22.71%
Negative operating income growth while PAAS is at 105.19%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
124.21%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 101.31%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
123.81%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 101.14%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
123.81%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 101.14%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-14.72%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
114.79%
Positive FCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
233.81%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 54.05%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
3.82%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-19.84%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
275.60%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-21.68%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-39.59%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
36.10%
Below 50% of PAAS's 128.03%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-70.63%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-72.98%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
379.39%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 124.64%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
52.05%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
13.33%
Positive short-term equity growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.29%
AR growth well above PAAS's 22.71%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.23%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.14%
Positive BV/share change while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-6.48%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.62%
We expand SG&A while PAAS cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.