PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.25%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of PAAS's 21.47%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
29.46%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PAAS's 167.88%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
37.40%
EBIT growth below 50% of PAAS's 570.14%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
37.40%
Operating income growth under 50% of PAAS's 570.14%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
47.16%
Net income growth under 50% of PAAS's 1844.99%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
40.00%
EPS growth under 50% of PAAS's 2100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
40.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of PAAS's 2100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
8.38%
Share count expansion well above PAAS's 0.03%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
8.40%
Diluted share count expanding well above PAAS's 0.24%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.03%
OCF growth under 50% of PAAS's 8462.78%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
16.51%
FCF growth under 50% of PAAS's 130.03%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
122.35%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 43.22%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-11.80%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
3.37%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 9.06%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
103.41%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 5.75%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-35.46%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-12.92%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PAAS stands at 13919.23%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
19.00%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 5.76% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-67.05%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-31.11%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PAAS is 118.05%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
304.82%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 34.85%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
59.92%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
22.20%
Positive short-term equity growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
180.39%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while PAAS is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
-67.63%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
156.53%
Our AR growth while PAAS is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.03%
Negative asset growth while PAAS invests at 2.93%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
7.42%
BV/share growth above 1.5x PAAS's 2.65%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-48.50%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.25%
We cut SG&A while PAAS invests at 24.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.