95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-23.42%
Negative revenue growth while PAAS stands at 4.25%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-18.86%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-23.52%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-23.52%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
463.45%
Positive net income growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
460.00%
Positive EPS growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
460.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while PAAS stands at 100.30%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-31.36%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-31.00%
Negative FCF growth while PAAS is at 43.40%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
124.38%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 106.45%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
-20.60%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-3.10%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
100.65%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 751.43%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-41.38%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-15.46%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PAAS stands at 5.89%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
22.82%
Positive 10Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-66.69%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-37.90%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PAAS is 180.71%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
256.57%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 32.77%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
44.22%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
17.38%
Positive short-term equity growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.26%
AR growth well above PAAS's 15.30%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.10%
Negative asset growth while PAAS invests at 0.16%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.73%
Under 50% of PAAS's 1.61%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-10.81%
We’re deleveraging while PAAS stands at 1.09%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
114.57%
SG&A growth well above PAAS's 2.99%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.