PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.46%
Revenue growth similar to PAAS's 18.47%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
15.06%
Positive gross profit growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
16.70%
EBIT growth below 50% of PAAS's 198.85%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
16.70%
Operating income growth under 50% of PAAS's 198.85%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-306.84%
Negative net income growth while PAAS stands at 183.33%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-306.67%
Negative EPS growth while PAAS is at 190.91%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-306.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while PAAS is at 190.91%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.14%
Share count expansion well above PAAS's 0.02%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.16%
Diluted share count expanding well above PAAS's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-9.68%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
27.85%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 24.29%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
27.22%
FCF growth 75-90% of PAAS's 34.67%. Bill Ackman might push for improved capital allocation or operational changes to match the competitor.
143.50%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 31.57%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-32.40%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
44.73%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 37.07%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
141.95%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 48.42%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-47.98%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
46.92%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 9429.18%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-379.09%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-162.02%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while PAAS is 267.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-321.70%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PAAS is 109.18%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
215.88%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 26.47%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
26.24%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
13.10%
Positive short-term equity growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.02%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while PAAS is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
62.84%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while PAAS cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-45.82%
Firm’s AR is declining while PAAS shows 6.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.25%
Negative asset growth while PAAS invests at 4.43%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-3.45%
We have a declining book value while PAAS shows 3.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-9.84%
We’re deleveraging while PAAS stands at 40.43%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.81%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.