PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.60%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 4.59%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
2.05%
Positive gross profit growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
2.39%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 1.86%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
2.39%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 1.86%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
367.01%
Positive net income growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
380.00%
Positive EPS growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
380.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.10%
Slight or no buybacks while PAAS is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.13%
Diluted share count expanding well above PAAS's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.87%
OCF growth under 50% of PAAS's 94.62%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-483.01%
Negative FCF growth while PAAS is at 1181.91%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
115.86%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 9.60%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
1.89%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 21.77%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
17.79%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of PAAS's 22.93%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
90.20%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-13.59%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while PAAS is at 13999.22%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
12.80%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 221.85%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
590.04%
Positive 10Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
258.13%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 119.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
439.98%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of PAAS's 588.90%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
227.59%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 17.29%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
30.26%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
6.84%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 4.20%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.93%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
71.00%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while PAAS cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
453.10%
Our AR growth while PAAS is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.26%
Asset growth above 1.5x PAAS's 1.72%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
6.16%
BV/share growth above 1.5x PAAS's 2.06%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
44.27%
We have some new debt while PAAS reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.15%
We expand SG&A while PAAS cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.