PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.54%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-33.72%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-35.05%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-35.05%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-89.31%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-88.89%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-88.89%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.10%
Share count expansion well above PAAS's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.08%
Slight or no buyback while PAAS is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-47.61%
Dividend reduction while PAAS stands at 3.51%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-19.81%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
16.12%
Positive FCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
163.47%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 24.44%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-10.49%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
10.49%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 16.49%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
171.76%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-26.75%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while PAAS is at 1.12%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-0.73%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PAAS stands at 25.51%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-6.14%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-64.60%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
132.33%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 86.04%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
222.43%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 15.46%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
25.26%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
8.87%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to PAAS's 8.63%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.77%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
86.39%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while PAAS cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-84.01%
Firm’s AR is declining while PAAS shows 0.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.95%
Positive asset growth while PAAS is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-1.00%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
44.33%
We have some new debt while PAAS reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.81%
We cut SG&A while PAAS invests at 1.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.