PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.48%
Revenue growth under 50% of PAAS's 34.20%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
34.24%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PAAS's 468.50%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
61.16%
EBIT growth below 50% of PAAS's 162.70%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
61.16%
Operating income growth under 50% of PAAS's 162.70%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
739.91%
Net income growth above 1.5x PAAS's 152.15%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
766.67%
EPS growth above 1.5x PAAS's 104.76%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
766.67%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x PAAS's 104.76%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while PAAS stands at 18.71%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
8.97%
Positive OCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
9.36%
Positive FCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
264.31%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 57.55%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
9.44%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
8.83%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 26.59%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
210.93%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-17.22%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-5.79%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
130.83%
Similar net income/share CAGR to PAAS's 140.02%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
-42.21%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while PAAS is 317.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
26.90%
Below 50% of PAAS's 1548.91%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
180.93%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 44.44%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
22.48%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
14.01%
Below 50% of PAAS's 59.27%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.61%
Firm’s AR is declining while PAAS shows 83.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.13%
Asset growth well under 50% of PAAS's 76.30%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.04%
Under 50% of PAAS's 38.24%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-6.01%
We’re deleveraging while PAAS stands at 5338.90%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.36%
We cut SG&A while PAAS invests at 8.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.