95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.17%
Negative revenue growth while PAAS stands at 14.82%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
0.25%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PAAS's 54.44%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
3.15%
EBIT growth below 50% of PAAS's 34.22%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
3.15%
Operating income growth under 50% of PAAS's 34.22%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
2.06%
Net income growth under 50% of PAAS's 37.89%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.22%
Share count expansion well above PAAS's 0.06%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.23%
Diluted share count expanding well above PAAS's 0.07%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
3.61%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while PAAS cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-7.33%
Negative OCF growth while PAAS is at 57.99%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-7.91%
Negative FCF growth while PAAS is at 146.92%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
88.45%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 33.26%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
31.69%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 79.19%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-14.86%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PAAS stands at 54.07%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
42.03%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 26.18%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
16.03%
Below 50% of PAAS's 11269.75%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-25.58%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PAAS stands at 105.88%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
16.64%
Positive 10Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
23.39%
Below 50% of PAAS's 107.13%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
603.37%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 73.16%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
136.18%
Positive growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
21.55%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 13.89%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
6.29%
Below 50% of PAAS's 28.10%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.38%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while PAAS is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
47.34%
Below 50% of PAAS's 179.99%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
17.16%
Our AR growth while PAAS is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.31%
Asset growth above 1.5x PAAS's 0.16%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
2.16%
BV/share growth above 1.5x PAAS's 0.65%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-13.66%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.41%
SG&A declining or stable vs. PAAS's 21.51%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.