95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.68%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
0.85%
Positive gross profit growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-6.90%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-6.90%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
11.50%
Net income growth under 50% of PAAS's 126.12%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
14.29%
EPS growth under 50% of PAAS's 127.03%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of PAAS's 127.03%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.19%
Share count expansion well above PAAS's 0.12%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.26%
Diluted share count expanding well above PAAS's 0.23%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.53%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-14.16%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
99.48%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
35.84%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 3.42%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
22.28%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
73.19%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
25.11%
Below 50% of PAAS's 120.17%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
19.89%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 6.63%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
51.85%
Positive 10Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
77.41%
Below 50% of PAAS's 297.83%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
54.11%
Positive short-term CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
123.94%
Positive growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
9.22%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 14.25%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
6.03%
Below 50% of PAAS's 19.77%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
117.08%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while PAAS is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
56.86%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 99.93%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.
94433.33%
Our AR growth while PAAS is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.94%
Positive asset growth while PAAS is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.22%
BV/share growth above 1.5x PAAS's 0.32%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-10.44%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.81%
SG&A growth well above PAAS's 32.65%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.