PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.94%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of PAAS's 3.81%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
3.70%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PAAS's 14.54%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-0.01%
Negative EBIT growth while PAAS is at 27.94%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-0.01%
Negative operating income growth while PAAS is at 27.94%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
2.54%
Net income growth under 50% of PAAS's 1009.71%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
2.78%
EPS growth under 50% of PAAS's 1016.44%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
2.78%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of PAAS's 1016.44%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.13%
Share count expansion well above PAAS's 0.01%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.13%
Diluted share count expanding well above PAAS's 0.08%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.78%
Negative OCF growth while PAAS is at 191.94%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
97.38%
FCF growth under 50% of PAAS's 232.29%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
33.15%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
50.97%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 43.70%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
53.17%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 28.69%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
0.93%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
56.40%
Positive OCF/share growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
57.62%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-11.94%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
167.29%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 51.72%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-48.58%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PAAS is 42.91%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
90.57%
Positive growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
19.17%
Below 50% of PAAS's 42.94%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
11.80%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 20.80%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
666.81%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 179.66%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
173.48%
Below 50% of PAAS's 460.11%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
57.86%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 106.96%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.
139.98%
AR growth well above PAAS's 4.02%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-1.95%
Inventory is declining while PAAS stands at 13.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.89%
Asset growth well under 50% of PAAS's 2.75%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.93%
75-90% of PAAS's 2.19%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
-4.69%
We’re deleveraging while PAAS stands at 54.66%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.08%
SG&A growth well above PAAS's 17.55%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.