PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.41%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-9.76%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-6.19%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-6.19%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-5.33%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-5.71%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-5.71%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.14%
Share count expansion well above PAAS's 0.02%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.09%
Slight or no buyback while PAAS is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.99%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
15.97%
Positive FCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
17.83%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 23.88%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
48.43%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 23.02%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
57.84%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 19.73%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-6.51%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while PAAS stands at 392.45%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
61.94%
Positive OCF/share growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
86.47%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-17.41%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
115.73%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
218.03%
Positive short-term CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
76.72%
Positive growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
24.80%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with PAAS's 23.63%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
23.93%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 1.94%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
44.13%
Below 50% of PAAS's 219.54%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
119.91%
Below 50% of PAAS's 379.79%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
82.04%
Below 50% of PAAS's 242.85%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-46.31%
Firm’s AR is declining while PAAS shows 10.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
61.49%
We show growth while PAAS is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-0.33%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.92%
Positive BV/share change while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-9.45%
We’re deleveraging while PAAS stands at 34.39%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.46%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.