PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.19%
Revenue growth under 50% of PAAS's 14.09%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
9.00%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PAAS's 48.98%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
6.22%
EBIT growth below 50% of PAAS's 110.59%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
6.22%
Operating income growth under 50% of PAAS's 110.59%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-25.44%
Negative net income growth while PAAS stands at 29.14%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-25.00%
Negative EPS growth while PAAS is at 28.89%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-25.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while PAAS is at 28.89%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.07%
Slight or no buybacks while PAAS is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.10%
Slight or no buyback while PAAS is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.73%
OCF growth under 50% of PAAS's 165.08%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
176.60%
FCF growth under 50% of PAAS's 433.25%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
58.74%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 42.60%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
55.15%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 39.95%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
-10.17%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PAAS stands at 4.03%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
79.88%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 38.71%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
110.42%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 11.91%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
7.26%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to PAAS's 7.68%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
51.96%
Positive 10Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
196.44%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-26.91%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
61.34%
Positive growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
37.69%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 10.24%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
19.58%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 1.32%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
144.99%
Stable or rising dividend while PAAS is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
115.34%
5Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 185.77%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging policy in mid-term shareholder returns.
33.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 75-90% of PAAS's 42.88%. Bill Ackman wants overhead or revenue enhancements to match competitor's dividend growth.
80.90%
Our AR growth while PAAS is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-8195400.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
0.97%
Positive asset growth while PAAS is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.18%
Positive BV/share change while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-3.35%
We’re deleveraging while PAAS stands at 0.34%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.05%
SG&A growth well above PAAS's 5.78%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.