PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.09%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of PAAS's 4.36%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
6.25%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PAAS's 59.11%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
4.11%
EBIT growth below 50% of PAAS's 107.27%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
4.11%
Operating income growth under 50% of PAAS's 107.27%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
26.42%
Net income growth under 50% of PAAS's 361.04%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
25.93%
EPS growth under 50% of PAAS's 365.34%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
25.93%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of PAAS's 365.34%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.05%
Share count expansion well above PAAS's 0.01%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.04%
Diluted share count expanding well above PAAS's 0.03%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-49.72%
Dividend reduction while PAAS stands at 0.40%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
8.76%
OCF growth under 50% of PAAS's 40.25%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
20.73%
FCF growth under 50% of PAAS's 76.47%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
46.83%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 67.66%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
35.78%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 17.37%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
13.77%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
66.91%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 147.24%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
76.04%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 60.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
25.43%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
2617.04%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 217.78% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
100.51%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
13.76%
Below 50% of PAAS's 63.51%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
59.30%
Positive growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
37.47%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 9.17%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
20.03%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 1.67%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
208.45%
Stable or rising dividend while PAAS is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
111.38%
5Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 186.91%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging policy in mid-term shareholder returns.
21.38%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 0.42%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
35.90%
AR growth well above PAAS's 1.14%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
100.00%
Inventory growth well above PAAS's 8.97%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.90%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 1.55%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
1.34%
BV/share growth above 1.5x PAAS's 0.47%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-1.26%
We’re deleveraging while PAAS stands at 0.72%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.27%
We expand SG&A while PAAS cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.