PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.62%
Positive revenue growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
0.89%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PAAS's 35.64%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
136.68%
Positive EBIT growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
147.14%
Positive operating income growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
188.14%
Net income growth above 1.5x PAAS's 56.78%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
194.74%
EPS growth above 1.5x PAAS's 56.67%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
194.74%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x PAAS's 56.67%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.01%
Slight or no buybacks while PAAS is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.01%
Slight or no buyback while PAAS is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
194.63%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 81.63%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
82.23%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 24.87%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
52.17%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 2.08%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
320.09%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 464.41%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
164.17%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 227.14%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
60.31%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 28.04%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.42%
SG&A declining or stable vs. PAAS's 288.89%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.