PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-14.48%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-14.48%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
219.35%
EBIT growth 75-90% of RGLD's 280.60%. Bill Ackman would push for cost reforms or better product mix to narrow the gap.
219.35%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of RGLD's 280.60%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
311.06%
Positive net income growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
975.86%
Positive EPS growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
975.86%
Positive diluted EPS growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
835.87%
OCF growth above 1.5x RGLD's 28.14%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
835.87%
FCF growth above 1.5x RGLD's 28.59%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
7.47%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 803.08%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
7.47%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 67.24%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
7.47%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 55.54%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.39%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while RGLD stands at 1044.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-24.39%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while RGLD is at 106.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-24.39%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while RGLD is at 191.92%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.57%
Our AR growth while RGLD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-6.58%
Inventory is declining while RGLD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.06%
Asset growth well under 50% of RGLD's 49.26%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.07%
Under 50% of RGLD's 54.00%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-148.44%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.