PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.81%
Negative revenue growth while RGLD stands at 79.24%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-8.81%
Negative gross profit growth while RGLD is at 82.20%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-197.39%
Negative EBIT growth while RGLD is at 120.59%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-197.39%
Negative operating income growth while RGLD is at 120.59%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-197.36%
Negative net income growth while RGLD stands at 100.69%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-198.04%
Negative EPS growth while RGLD is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-198.04%
Negative diluted EPS growth while RGLD is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.39%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-92.39%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
13.24%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 2620.64%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
13.24%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 3980.96%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
8.73%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 100.66%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.50%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. RGLD's 82.17%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
7.03%
Inventory growth of 7.03% while RGLD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
3.74%
Asset growth above 1.5x RGLD's 1.15%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.49%
Positive BV/share change while RGLD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.49%
SG&A growth well above RGLD's 16.62%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.