PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
34.63%
Positive revenue growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
34.63%
Positive gross profit growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
315.91%
Positive EBIT growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
315.91%
Positive operating income growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
460.42%
Positive net income growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
-266.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-266.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4117.61%
OCF growth above 1.5x RGLD's 49.01%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
4117.61%
FCF growth above 1.5x RGLD's 48.49%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
48.45%
10Y CAGR of 48.45% while RGLD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
48.45%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 635.78%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-24.46%
Negative 3Y CAGR while RGLD stands at 62.59%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.15%
Our AR growth while RGLD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
7.29%
Inventory growth of 7.29% while RGLD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
13.98%
Similar asset growth to RGLD's 13.85%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
15.09%
BV/share growth above 1.5x RGLD's 3.06%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.37%
SG&A declining or stable vs. RGLD's 64.98%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.