PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.05%
Negative revenue growth while RGLD stands at 12.86%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-15.05%
Negative gross profit growth while RGLD is at 12.39%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-31.12%
Negative EBIT growth while RGLD is at 56.10%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-31.12%
Negative operating income growth while RGLD is at 56.10%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-25.48%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
171.04%
Positive EPS growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
171.04%
Positive diluted EPS growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-185.05%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-185.05%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
35.12%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 910.18%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
35.12%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 838.02%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
15.00%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 133.05%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-224.40%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD stands at 159.63%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.74%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while RGLD stands at 1587.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-29.74%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while RGLD is at 268.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-31.50%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while RGLD is at 308.87%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.53%
AR growth well above RGLD's 8.84%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
17.35%
Inventory growth of 17.35% while RGLD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-13.66%
Negative asset growth while RGLD invests at 0.69%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-23.19%
We have a declining book value while RGLD shows 0.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-163.74%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.