PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
47.14%
Positive revenue growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
70.16%
Positive gross profit growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
78.16%
Positive EBIT growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
78.16%
Positive operating income growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
96.62%
Positive net income growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
84.21%
Positive EPS growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
105.88%
Positive diluted EPS growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.11%
OCF growth under 50% of RGLD's 3424.14%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-3124.58%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
81.04%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 308.17%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
36841732.28%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 200.65%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
59.87%
Positive 3Y CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1234.52%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 833.12%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
14311.97%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 162.64%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26453.71%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 282.41%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
1590.09%
Positive short-term CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
672.20%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 87.17%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.16%
Our AR growth while RGLD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-28.98%
Inventory is declining while RGLD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
117.23%
Asset growth above 1.5x RGLD's 1.04%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
50.21%
BV/share growth above 1.5x RGLD's 0.89%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.80%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.