95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.56%
Negative revenue growth while RGLD stands at 27.34%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
4.22%
Gross profit growth under 50% of RGLD's 41.34%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-7.57%
Negative EBIT growth while RGLD is at 40.90%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-7.57%
Negative operating income growth while RGLD is at 40.90%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
12.24%
Net income growth under 50% of RGLD's 49.44%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
18.18%
EPS growth of 18.18% while RGLD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 10.00% while RGLD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.85%
Negative OCF growth while RGLD is at 201.17%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-3.85%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
184.72%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 8983.29%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
151.42%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 122.58%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
127.75%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 115.61%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28313.94%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 220.55%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
380.54%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 104.47%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2594.52%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 84.95%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
303.15%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 70.71%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1208.81%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 331.49%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
281.49%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to RGLD's 261.70%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.63%
AR growth well above RGLD's 18.48%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.23%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
4.09%
Positive BV/share change while RGLD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-7.99%
We’re deleveraging while RGLD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
78.22%
SG&A growth well above RGLD's 0.66%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.