PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.28%
Positive revenue growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-82.43%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-95.52%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-95.52%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-362.24%
Negative net income growth while RGLD stands at 272.19%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-300.00%
Negative EPS growth while RGLD is at 270.59%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-325.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while RGLD is at 264.71%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
16.15%
Share count expansion well above RGLD's 0.10%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
9.54%
Diluted share count expanding well above RGLD's 0.28%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.52%
Positive OCF growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
1.52%
Positive FCF growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
80.95%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 2335.35%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-0.77%
Negative 5Y CAGR while RGLD stands at 75.99%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
44.83%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 32.29%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25090.08%
Positive OCF/share growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
89.40%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of RGLD's 106.95%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-966.69%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while RGLD is 474.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-585.45%
Negative 3Y CAGR while RGLD is 404.43%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1055.47%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 294.84%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
129.36%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to RGLD's 124.57%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
284.08%
AR growth well above RGLD's 30.21%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.32%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 4.63%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
-9.40%
We have a declining book value while RGLD shows 4.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
5.91%
Debt growth of 5.91% while RGLD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.39%
SG&A growth well above RGLD's 26.99%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.