PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.31%
Revenue growth under 50% of RGLD's 42.23%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
428.44%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x RGLD's 44.96%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
1191.12%
EBIT growth above 1.5x RGLD's 199.08%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
1191.12%
Operating income growth above 1.5x RGLD's 199.08%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
130.31%
Positive net income growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
133.33%
Positive EPS growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
133.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.83%
Positive OCF growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-7.04%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
80.53%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 11111.18%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
201.03%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 111.09%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-0.28%
Negative 3Y CAGR while RGLD stands at 149.70%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1448.55%
Positive OCF/share growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
13.81%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
163.84%
Positive 5Y CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-25.18%
Negative 3Y CAGR while RGLD is 57.48%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2112.95%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 284.55%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
94.55%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of RGLD's 122.97%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.40%
AR growth well above RGLD's 36.76%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.66%
Positive asset growth while RGLD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
27.41%
BV/share growth above 1.5x RGLD's 0.06%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-58.40%
We’re deleveraging while RGLD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.83%
We expand SG&A while RGLD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.