PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
68.51%
Revenue growth above 1.5x RGLD's 17.25%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
62.95%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x RGLD's 16.03%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
82.56%
EBIT growth above 1.5x RGLD's 15.61%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
82.56%
Operating income growth above 1.5x RGLD's 15.61%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
82.05%
Net income growth above 1.5x RGLD's 0.95%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
57.14%
Positive EPS growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
83.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
5.19%
Share count expansion well above RGLD's 6.81%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
5.38%
Diluted share count expanding well above RGLD's 6.62%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.55%
OCF growth at 75-90% of RGLD's 87.34%. Bill Ackman would demand better working capital management or cost discipline.
-769.02%
Negative FCF growth while RGLD is at 87.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
201.56%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 455.21%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.40%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 53.17%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.53%
Below 50% of RGLD's 76.91%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
12.86%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 20.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
261.32%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 46.36%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
4.77%
Positive short-term CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1398.92%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 2277.49%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
-82.05%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while RGLD is at 357.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
87.66%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 165.10%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.67%
AR growth well above RGLD's 10.21%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.25%
Positive asset growth while RGLD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
19.91%
Positive BV/share change while RGLD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
88.69%
We have some new debt while RGLD reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.89%
We cut SG&A while RGLD invests at 25.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.