Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)

Positive revenue growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.

Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.

Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.

Slight or no buybacks while RGLD is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.

Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.

Positive OCF growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.

Positive FCF growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.

10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 444.38%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.

5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 75.30%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.

3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 75.46%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.

10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 410.77%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.

5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 194.73%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.

3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 195.36%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.

Positive 10Y CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 51.56%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.

3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 89.46%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.

10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 2021.27%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.

3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 59.48%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.

Firm’s AR is declining while RGLD shows 4.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

We’re deleveraging while RGLD stands at 156.34%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

We cut SG&A while RGLD invests at 3.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.