PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-28.37%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-23.08%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-19.72%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-19.72%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-24.94%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-24.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-26.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while RGLD stands at 43.10%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-34.81%
Negative OCF growth while RGLD is at 525.64%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-787.15%
Negative FCF growth while RGLD is at 107.18%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
565.78%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 320.44%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
164.81%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 88.90%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
131.26%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 46.81%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
89499.57%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 797.99%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
215.34%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 180.14%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
177.71%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 8846.51%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
7607.09%
Positive 10Y CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
200.94%
Positive 5Y CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
188.75%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to RGLD's 177.93%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
3166.37%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 911.69%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
149.57%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 134.46%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
75.26%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 45.73%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.73%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.97%
Asset growth above 1.5x RGLD's 0.24%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.82%
Positive BV/share change while RGLD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
2077.39%
Debt growth far above RGLD's 0.76%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.73%
SG&A growth well above RGLD's 21.65%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.