PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-18.89%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-39.72%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-39.72%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-39.72%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-46.70%
Negative net income growth while RGLD stands at 65.58%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-47.37%
Negative EPS growth while RGLD is at 67.09%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-45.95%
Negative diluted EPS growth while RGLD is at 66.70%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.11%
Slight or no buybacks while RGLD is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-0.16%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.37%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
100.02%
Positive FCF growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
300.67%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of RGLD's 389.82%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
111.87%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 34.22%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
69.77%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 8.52%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1505.06%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 254.87%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
120.11%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 95.42%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
80.71%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 46.88%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
1009.06%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 108.99% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
92.68%
Positive 5Y CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
29.05%
Positive short-term CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
2727.43%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 891.58%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
151.50%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with RGLD's 146.56%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
68.17%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 28.83%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.55%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.10%
Negative asset growth while RGLD invests at 0.40%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-0.37%
We have a declining book value while RGLD shows 0.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
4.84%
Debt growth far above RGLD's 0.77%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.62%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.