PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.22%
Negative revenue growth while RGLD stands at 9.40%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
1.53%
Gross profit growth under 50% of RGLD's 17.78%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
1.53%
EBIT growth below 50% of RGLD's 24.86%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
1.53%
Operating income growth under 50% of RGLD's 24.86%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-15.01%
Negative net income growth while RGLD stands at 88.83%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-15.38%
Negative EPS growth while RGLD is at 93.75%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-15.38%
Negative diluted EPS growth while RGLD is at 93.75%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while RGLD stands at 4.90%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-7.83%
Negative OCF growth while RGLD is at 29.27%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-109.37%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
436.30%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 206.85%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
232.88%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 45.36%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
3.23%
Positive 3Y CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
5716.61%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 289.67%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
275.62%
Below 50% of RGLD's 3036.86%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-10.86%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
355.00%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 118.39% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
299.42%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 154.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-35.50%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
4976.04%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 826.03%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
129.38%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with RGLD's 140.81%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
41.54%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 37.68%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while RGLD invests at 90.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-13.59%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.98%
Positive asset growth while RGLD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.93%
Positive BV/share change while RGLD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.04%
We’re deleveraging while RGLD stands at 0.79%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.32%
We expand SG&A while RGLD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.