95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.63%
Positive revenue growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
9.27%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x RGLD's 2.40%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
9.27%
Positive EBIT growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
9.27%
Positive operating income growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-92.92%
Negative net income growth while RGLD stands at 12.28%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-94.44%
Negative EPS growth while RGLD is at 13.19%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-94.44%
Negative diluted EPS growth while RGLD is at 13.42%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.20%
Share count expansion well above RGLD's 0.04%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.19%
Diluted share count expanding well above RGLD's 0.06%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-60.06%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
17.39%
OCF growth under 50% of RGLD's 63.34%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
8.48%
FCF growth under 50% of RGLD's 45.49%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
107.92%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 64.80%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-11.70%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
154.13%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 257.38%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
132.02%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 102.01%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
-29.04%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
118.90%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of RGLD's 139.20%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
-88.28%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while RGLD is 63.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-96.72%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-65.69%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while RGLD stands at 792.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
91.18%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with RGLD's 95.00%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
40.25%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 35.72%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.67%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 90.63%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.
-64.69%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while RGLD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.13%
Asset growth above 1.5x RGLD's 0.05%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
2.66%
BV/share growth above 1.5x RGLD's 0.20%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
0.03%
Debt shrinking faster vs. RGLD's 0.79%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.63%
We cut SG&A while RGLD invests at 17.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.