PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.48%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-16.49%
Negative gross profit growth while RGLD is at 6.74%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-22.71%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-22.71%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
124.21%
Positive net income growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
123.81%
Positive EPS growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
123.81%
Positive diluted EPS growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while RGLD stands at 4.52%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-14.72%
Negative OCF growth while RGLD is at 26.77%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
114.79%
FCF growth 75-90% of RGLD's 131.34%. Bill Ackman might push for improved capital allocation or operational changes to match the competitor.
233.81%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 486.51%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
3.82%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 42.42%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-19.84%
Negative 3Y CAGR while RGLD stands at 25.57%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
275.60%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 230.41%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
-21.68%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD is at 36.34%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-39.59%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
36.10%
Positive 10Y CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-70.63%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-72.98%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
379.39%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with RGLD's 408.36%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
52.05%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 30.36%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
13.33%
Positive short-term equity growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while RGLD stands at 108.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.29%
AR growth well above RGLD's 16.98%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.23%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.14%
Positive BV/share change while RGLD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-6.48%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.62%
SG&A declining or stable vs. RGLD's 31.47%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.