PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.88%
Revenue growth under 50% of RGLD's 1.83%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
9.53%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of RGLD's 11.30%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
8.65%
Positive EBIT growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
8.65%
Positive operating income growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
10.43%
Positive net income growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
7.14%
Positive EPS growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
7.14%
Positive diluted EPS growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.07%
Share count expansion well above RGLD's 0.01%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.09%
Diluted share count expanding well above RGLD's 0.07%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.97%
Positive OCF growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
4.72%
Positive FCF growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
141.61%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of RGLD's 184.32%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
-20.62%
Negative 5Y CAGR while RGLD stands at 62.18%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
8.81%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 54.73%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
124.63%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 336.57%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-42.27%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD is at 48.12%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-1.57%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD stands at 101.60%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
48.42%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 32.01% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-61.72%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-13.79%
Negative 3Y CAGR while RGLD is 19.90%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
238.97%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 167.35%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
41.60%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 10.76%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
16.36%
Positive short-term equity growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.46%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while RGLD stands at 56.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-5.82%
Negative near-term dividend growth while RGLD invests at 14.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
13.77%
AR growth well above RGLD's 26.44%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.47%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
1.03%
BV/share growth above 1.5x RGLD's 0.15%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-10.43%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.14%
SG&A declining or stable vs. RGLD's 83.32%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.