PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.46%
Revenue growth above 1.5x RGLD's 1.66%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
15.06%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x RGLD's 0.10%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
16.70%
Positive EBIT growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
16.70%
Positive operating income growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-306.84%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-306.67%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-306.67%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.14%
Share count expansion well above RGLD's 0.11%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.16%
Slight or no buyback while RGLD is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-9.68%
Dividend reduction while RGLD stands at 0.06%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
27.85%
OCF growth above 1.5x RGLD's 5.61%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
27.22%
FCF growth above 1.5x RGLD's 5.62%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
143.50%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 254.44%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
-32.40%
Negative 5Y CAGR while RGLD stands at 40.18%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
44.73%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 85.66%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
141.95%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 795.64%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-47.98%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD is at 580.37%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
46.92%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 152.46%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-379.09%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-162.02%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-321.70%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
215.88%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 114.05%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
26.24%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
13.10%
Positive short-term equity growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.02%
Below 50% of RGLD's 71.54%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
62.84%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 14.20%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-45.82%
Firm’s AR is declining while RGLD shows 2.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.25%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-3.45%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-9.84%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.81%
We cut SG&A while RGLD invests at 38.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.