PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.60%
Revenue growth above 1.5x RGLD's 0.22%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
2.05%
Positive gross profit growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
2.39%
EBIT growth below 50% of RGLD's 118.74%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
2.39%
Operating income growth under 50% of RGLD's 118.74%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
367.01%
Net income growth above 1.5x RGLD's 117.35%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
380.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x RGLD's 117.45%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
380.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x RGLD's 117.45%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.10%
Share count expansion well above RGLD's 0.02%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.13%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x RGLD's 0.31%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.87%
Positive OCF growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-483.01%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
115.86%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 166.88%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
1.89%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 98.84%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
17.79%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 57.27%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
90.20%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 267.89%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-13.59%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD is at 88.26%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
12.80%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 74.63%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
590.04%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 68.67% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
258.13%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 144.19%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
439.98%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 79.08%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
227.59%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 116.39%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
30.26%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
6.84%
Positive short-term equity growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.93%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while RGLD stands at 23.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
71.00%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 13.58%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
453.10%
Our AR growth while RGLD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.26%
Positive asset growth while RGLD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
6.16%
BV/share growth above 1.5x RGLD's 0.49%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
44.27%
We have some new debt while RGLD reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.15%
SG&A growth well above RGLD's 34.68%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.