PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.54%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-33.72%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-35.05%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-35.05%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-89.31%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-88.89%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-88.89%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.10%
Share count expansion well above RGLD's 0.09%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.08%
Slight or no buyback while RGLD is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-47.61%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-19.81%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
16.12%
Positive FCF growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
163.47%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 222.73%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
-10.49%
Negative 5Y CAGR while RGLD stands at 75.62%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
10.49%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 34.35%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
171.76%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 7.31%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-26.75%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD is at 24.79%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-0.73%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD stands at 1682.98%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-6.14%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while RGLD is at 35.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-64.60%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
132.33%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to RGLD's 133.15%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
222.43%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 124.15%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
25.26%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
8.87%
Positive short-term equity growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.77%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while RGLD stands at 24.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
86.39%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 13.62%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-84.01%
Firm’s AR is declining while RGLD shows 19.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.95%
Positive asset growth while RGLD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-1.00%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
44.33%
Debt growth far above RGLD's 1.11%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.81%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.