95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.01%
Revenue growth above 1.5x RGLD's 2.66%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
42.43%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x RGLD's 20.87%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
173.43%
EBIT growth above 1.5x RGLD's 19.79%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
173.43%
Operating income growth above 1.5x RGLD's 19.79%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
160.92%
Net income growth comparable to RGLD's 166.29%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
160.71%
EPS growth similar to RGLD's 167.50%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
160.71%
Similar diluted EPS growth to RGLD's 167.50%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
0.23%
Share count expansion well above RGLD's 0.08%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.31%
Diluted share count expanding well above RGLD's 0.12%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-48.78%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
30.24%
Positive OCF growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
30.44%
Positive FCF growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
124.83%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 181.40%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
8.13%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 70.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-5.44%
Negative 3Y CAGR while RGLD stands at 0.16%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
119.98%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 172.23%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
-5.19%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD is at 34.76%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-13.15%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD stands at 28.58%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
58.76%
Below 50% of RGLD's 511.67%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
1255.10%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 274.26%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-9.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while RGLD is 135.26%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
121.53%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 79.54%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
15.88%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
3.35%
Positive short-term equity growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.92%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 26.04%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
66.54%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 15.11%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
156.25%
AR growth well above RGLD's 29.43%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.29%
Asset growth above 1.5x RGLD's 0.15%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.52%
50-75% of RGLD's 2.30%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-7.47%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.56%
SG&A declining or stable vs. RGLD's 17.38%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.