PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.44%
Positive revenue growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-0.52%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
3.37%
Positive EBIT growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
3.37%
Positive operating income growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
116.27%
Positive net income growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
116.67%
Positive EPS growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
116.67%
Positive diluted EPS growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.06%
Dividend growth 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 0.04%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if management’s capital return strategy is more aggressive yet sustainable.
-2.98%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-154.52%
Negative FCF growth while RGLD is at 176.11%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
13.83%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
5.51%
Positive 5Y CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
39.64%
Positive 3Y CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-6.33%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD stands at 242.89%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
9.59%
Below 50% of RGLD's 69.35%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
77.68%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of RGLD's 101.58%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
58.27%
Positive 10Y CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
2532.91%
Positive 5Y CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
4117.56%
Positive short-term CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
84.86%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 46.64%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
24.04%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 13.84%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
19.25%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of RGLD's 22.28%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
41.31%
Below 50% of RGLD's 171.80%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
147.79%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 30.25%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
64.03%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 19.93%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
7.97%
Our AR growth while RGLD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
42.63%
We show growth while RGLD is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
4.12%
Positive asset growth while RGLD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.09%
BV/share growth above 1.5x RGLD's 1.82%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-6.08%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.95%
We expand SG&A while RGLD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.