95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.87%
Revenue growth under 50% of RGLD's 24.01%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
18.63%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of RGLD's 24.85%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
-2.88%
Negative EBIT growth while RGLD is at 18.91%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-2.88%
Negative operating income growth while RGLD is at 18.91%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-15.44%
Negative net income growth while RGLD stands at 23.11%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-13.95%
Negative EPS growth while RGLD is at 22.86%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-13.95%
Negative diluted EPS growth while RGLD is at 22.86%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.07%
Share count expansion well above RGLD's 0.02%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.09%
Diluted share count expanding well above RGLD's 0.00%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
7.85%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while RGLD cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
11.35%
OCF growth above 1.5x RGLD's 6.35%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
142.65%
FCF growth above 1.5x RGLD's 81.94%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-35.57%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while RGLD stands at 98.92%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-4.69%
Negative 5Y CAGR while RGLD stands at 41.91%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
4.75%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 31.62%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-46.91%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD stands at 804.93%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
2.05%
Below 50% of RGLD's 33.01%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
29.22%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to RGLD's 28.90%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
-26.72%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while RGLD is at 101.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
218.14%
Below 50% of RGLD's 480.14%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
112.27%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 36.23%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
69.51%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 13.79%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
34.27%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 20.87%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
24.94%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to RGLD's 23.50%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
91.37%
10Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 149.93%. Martin Whitman suspects the firm lags in returning cash to shareholders over the decade.
78.81%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 45.69%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
77.13%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 32.05%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
1.34%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. RGLD's 20.53%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-6.70%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.62%
Asset growth at 50-75% of RGLD's 4.67%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
2.51%
BV/share growth above 1.5x RGLD's 1.21%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-8.41%
We’re deleveraging while RGLD stands at 28.06%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.71%
SG&A growth well above RGLD's 16.69%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.