PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.79%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-16.44%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-17.01%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-17.01%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-17.73%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-21.88%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-21.88%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.02%
Share count expansion well above RGLD's 0.02%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.01%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-50.24%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-15.45%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-32.66%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
5.30%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 142.55%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
17.64%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 38.11%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-28.00%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
13.22%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 173.29%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
54.57%
Below 50% of RGLD's 119.00%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-25.62%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD stands at 4.09%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
18.59%
Below 50% of RGLD's 220.93%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
235.00%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to RGLD's 227.51%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
-23.01%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
61.85%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 19.65%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
29.21%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of RGLD's 34.97%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
22.22%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to RGLD's 21.10%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
46.20%
10Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 87.25%. Martin Whitman suspects the firm lags in returning cash to shareholders over the decade.
91.79%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 49.95%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
76.29%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 34.04%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
57.36%
AR growth well above RGLD's 6.33%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-50.99%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
0.02%
Positive asset growth while RGLD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-0.06%
We have a declining book value while RGLD shows 0.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-4.44%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.84%
We cut SG&A while RGLD invests at 9.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.