95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
44.37%
Revenue growth above 1.5x RGLD's 10.14%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
43.20%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x RGLD's 18.47%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
47.82%
EBIT growth above 1.5x RGLD's 21.55%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
47.82%
Operating income growth above 1.5x RGLD's 21.55%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
44.74%
Net income growth above 1.5x RGLD's 27.25%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
52.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x RGLD's 28.00%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
52.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x RGLD's 28.00%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.01%
Share reduction more than 1.5x RGLD's 0.02%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.02%
Slight or no buyback while RGLD is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
3.51%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while RGLD cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
45.21%
OCF growth above 1.5x RGLD's 3.02%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
-388.43%
Negative FCF growth while RGLD is at 5.76%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
51.80%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 185.99%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
60.74%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to RGLD's 55.87%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
11.68%
Positive 3Y CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
57.33%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 187.90%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
124.71%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 71.21%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
18.55%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 1.05%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
41.52%
Below 50% of RGLD's 481.95%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
2319.88%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 165.21%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
6.30%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 4.69%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
62.87%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 21.64%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
31.82%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of RGLD's 36.28%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
20.68%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to RGLD's 20.61%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
68.43%
10Y dividend/share CAGR at 75-90% of RGLD's 87.17%. Bill Ackman might push for a stronger payout policy to match the competitor’s returns.
95.52%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 49.96%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
45.29%
3Y dividend/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 34.01%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the company's short-term profits or payout policy justify these higher hikes.
-1.94%
Firm’s AR is declining while RGLD shows 5.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-43.80%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
1.74%
Positive asset growth while RGLD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.55%
1.25-1.5x RGLD's 1.34%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-0.75%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.62%
We expand SG&A while RGLD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.