PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.27%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-6.18%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-4.08%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-4.08%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-2.61%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-5.26%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-5.26%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.02%
Share count expansion well above RGLD's 0.01%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.01%
Diluted share count expanding well above RGLD's 0.02%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while RGLD stands at 6.66%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-11.81%
Negative OCF growth while RGLD is at 36.80%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-9.47%
Negative FCF growth while RGLD is at 32.20%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
40.93%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 155.20%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
28.77%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of RGLD's 35.15%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
-9.56%
Negative 3Y CAGR while RGLD stands at 4.29%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
50.50%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 204.96%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
81.81%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to RGLD's 77.92%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
-6.37%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD stands at 49.73%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
62.13%
Below 50% of RGLD's 131.75%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
180.54%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 63.33%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
0.46%
Positive short-term CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
62.55%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 22.98%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
32.72%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of RGLD's 36.46%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
20.48%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to RGLD's 19.77%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.46%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while RGLD stands at 16.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.54%
Positive asset growth while RGLD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.74%
BV/share growth above 1.5x RGLD's 0.77%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-4.23%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.25%
We cut SG&A while RGLD invests at 17.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.