PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.19%
Revenue growth under 50% of RGLD's 16.92%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
9.00%
Gross profit growth under 50% of RGLD's 29.51%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
6.22%
EBIT growth below 50% of RGLD's 35.16%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
6.22%
Operating income growth under 50% of RGLD's 35.16%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-25.44%
Negative net income growth while RGLD stands at 72.17%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-25.00%
Negative EPS growth while RGLD is at 70.83%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-25.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while RGLD is at 70.83%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.07%
Share count expansion well above RGLD's 0.02%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.10%
Diluted share count expanding well above RGLD's 0.04%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.73%
Positive OCF growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
176.60%
Positive FCF growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
58.74%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 145.50%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
55.15%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 49.93%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
-10.17%
Negative 3Y CAGR while RGLD stands at 3.45%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
79.88%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 249.60%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
110.42%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 56.52%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
7.26%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
51.96%
Below 50% of RGLD's 382.80%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
196.44%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to RGLD's 205.82%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
-26.91%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
61.34%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 24.71%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
37.69%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with RGLD's 38.44%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
19.58%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to RGLD's 19.01%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
144.99%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 90.32%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
115.34%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 50.98%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
33.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR similar to RGLD's 33.48%. Walter Schloss finds parallel short-term dividend strategies for both companies.
80.90%
AR growth well above RGLD's 9.81%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-8195400.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
0.97%
Positive asset growth while RGLD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.18%
50-75% of RGLD's 1.96%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-3.35%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.05%
We expand SG&A while RGLD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.