PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.62%
Positive revenue growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
0.89%
Positive gross profit growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
136.68%
Positive EBIT growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
147.14%
Positive operating income growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
188.14%
Net income growth above 1.5x RGLD's 5.67%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
194.74%
EPS growth above 1.5x RGLD's 4.88%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
194.74%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x RGLD's 5.52%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.01%
Share reduction more than 1.5x RGLD's 0.05%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.01%
Slight or no buyback while RGLD is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
194.63%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 158.34%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
82.23%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 41.36%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
52.17%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 18.89%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
320.09%
Similar net income/share CAGR to RGLD's 349.10%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
164.17%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of RGLD's 193.52%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
60.31%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of RGLD's 72.45%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.42%
SG&A growth well above RGLD's 24.18%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.