PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
88831098.78%
Revenue growth of 88831098.78% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
88831098.78%
Gross profit growth of 88831098.78% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
392.41%
Positive EBIT growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
392.41%
Positive operating income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-377.97%
Negative net income growth while SA stands at 16.85%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-350.00%
Negative EPS growth while SA is at 9.09%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-350.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SA is at 9.09%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
285.84%
Positive OCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
285.84%
Positive FCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
355.10%
10Y CAGR of 355.10% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
355.10%
5Y CAGR of 355.10% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
355.10%
3Y CAGR of 355.10% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.75%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while SA stands at 88.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-3.75%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SA is at 44.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-3.75%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SA is at 6.74%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-137.72%
We cut SG&A while SA invests at 13.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.