95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-14.48%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-14.48%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
219.35%
Positive EBIT growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
219.35%
Positive operating income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
311.06%
Positive net income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
975.86%
Positive EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
975.86%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
835.87%
Positive OCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
835.87%
Positive FCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
7.47%
10Y CAGR of 7.47% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
7.47%
5Y CAGR of 7.47% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
7.47%
3Y CAGR of 7.47% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.39%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-24.39%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-24.39%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.57%
Our AR growth while SA is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-6.58%
Inventory is declining while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.06%
Asset growth well under 50% of SA's 65.95%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.07%
Under 50% of SA's 106.23%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-148.44%
We cut SG&A while SA invests at 172.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.