PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.55%
Revenue growth of 20.55% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
20.55%
Gross profit growth of 20.55% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
-8.75%
Negative EBIT growth while SA is at 65.01%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-8.75%
Negative operating income growth while SA is at 65.01%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-56.84%
Negative net income growth while SA stands at 43.76%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-83.65%
Negative EPS growth while SA is at 60.50%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-83.65%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SA is at 60.50%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.10%
Negative OCF growth while SA is at 24.20%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-92.10%
Negative FCF growth while SA is at 79.30%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
26.10%
10Y CAGR of 26.10% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
26.10%
5Y CAGR of 26.10% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
21.17%
3Y CAGR of 21.17% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.50%
Firm’s AR is declining while SA shows 837.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
2.99%
Inventory growth of 2.99% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
1.10%
Asset growth well under 50% of SA's 4.31%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.57%
Positive BV/share change while SA is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
300.27%
We expand SG&A while SA cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.