PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-199.50%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-199.50%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-251.32%
Negative EBIT growth while SA is at 9.49%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-251.32%
Negative operating income growth while SA is at 9.49%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-511.39%
Negative net income growth while SA stands at 117.47%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-511.27%
Negative EPS growth while SA is at 117.33%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-511.27%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SA is at 117.33%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1856.19%
Positive OCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
1856.19%
Positive FCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-278.69%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-278.69%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-36363820.17%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.92%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31219.63%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA is 154.71%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while SA stands at 14.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-41.90%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-33.48%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-100.00%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-190.08%
We cut SG&A while SA invests at 99.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.