PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.10%
Revenue growth of 1.10% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
4.09%
Gross profit growth of 4.09% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
-47.73%
Negative EBIT growth while SA is at 25.09%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-47.73%
Negative operating income growth while SA is at 25.09%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
4.94%
Net income growth under 50% of SA's 50.78%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.23%
Positive OCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
0.23%
Positive FCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
159.51%
10Y CAGR of 159.51% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
191.27%
5Y CAGR of 191.27% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
245.23%
3Y CAGR of 245.23% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
257.85%
Positive OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
2350.83%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
230.55%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
228.94%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1189.90%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 892.23%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
1571.05%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 147.44%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.21%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.73%
Positive asset growth while SA is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
8.82%
Positive BV/share change while SA is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-100.00%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.23%
We expand SG&A while SA cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.