PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.50%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-7.30%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-5.62%
Negative EBIT growth while SA is at 24.30%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-5.62%
Negative operating income growth while SA is at 24.30%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-16.06%
Negative net income growth while SA stands at 24.35%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-10.00%
Negative EPS growth while SA is at 27.45%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-11.11%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SA is at 27.45%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.34%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 4.08%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.70%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 4.08%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.65%
Negative OCF growth while SA is at 8.02%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-2.65%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
141.24%
10Y CAGR of 141.24% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
124.47%
5Y CAGR of 124.47% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.43%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of SA's 45.53%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
-7.79%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
622.91%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 0.14%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
229.95%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
874.54%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 309.01%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
1188.92%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 309.01%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-88.33%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SA is at 154.82%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.81%
Firm’s AR is declining while SA shows 7.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.34%
Asset growth above 1.5x SA's 0.46%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.70%
Positive BV/share change while SA is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.06%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.