95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
26.85%
Revenue growth of 26.85% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
32.57%
Gross profit growth of 32.57% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
31.93%
EBIT growth above 1.5x SA's 0.64%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
31.93%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SA's 0.64%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
29.71%
Net income growth above 1.5x SA's 9.26%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
22.22%
EPS growth above 1.5x SA's 10.28%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x SA's 10.28%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.39%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 1.16%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
1.49%
Diluted share count expanding well above SA's 1.16%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.93%
OCF growth above 1.5x SA's 7.92%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
26.93%
FCF growth 50-75% of SA's 38.72%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
196.70%
10Y CAGR of 196.70% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
135.29%
5Y CAGR of 135.29% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
137.47%
3Y CAGR of 137.47% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2148.09%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 6.76%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
271.35%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2063.83%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
193.27%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1201.26%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 361.21%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
144.59%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SA's 169.49%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.70%
Our AR growth while SA is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.67%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x SA's 0.58%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
2.54%
Positive BV/share change while SA is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-3.49%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.77%
We expand SG&A while SA cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.