PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.56%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
4.22%
Gross profit growth of 4.22% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
-7.57%
Negative EBIT growth while SA is at 25.70%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-7.57%
Negative operating income growth while SA is at 25.70%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
12.24%
Net income growth under 50% of SA's 32.18%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
18.18%
EPS growth at 50-75% of SA's 32.12%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SA's 32.12%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.85%
Negative OCF growth while SA is at 8.72%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-3.85%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
184.72%
10Y CAGR of 184.72% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
151.42%
5Y CAGR of 151.42% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
127.75%
3Y CAGR of 127.75% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28313.94%
Positive OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
380.54%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2594.52%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
303.15%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1208.81%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 291.01%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
281.49%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 156.11%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.63%
AR growth well above SA's 57.71%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.23%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
4.09%
Positive BV/share change while SA is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-7.99%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
78.22%
We expand SG&A while SA cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.