PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.49%
Revenue growth of 1.49% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
1.48%
Gross profit growth of 1.48% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
0.13%
Positive EBIT growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
0.13%
Positive operating income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-16.66%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-23.08%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-18.18%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.21%
Share count expansion well above SA's 0.04%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.66%
Reduced diluted shares while SA is at 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.47%
OCF growth under 50% of SA's 61.47%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
8.47%
FCF growth under 50% of SA's 26.65%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
180.75%
10Y CAGR of 180.75% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
89.12%
5Y CAGR of 89.12% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
92.51%
3Y CAGR of 92.51% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
629.21%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 26.69%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
189.53%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 18.89%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
475.60%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
158.49%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1024.24%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 212.32%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
261.75%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 219.14%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.98%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.52%
Asset growth above 1.5x SA's 1.14%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-1.14%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
27.56%
Debt growth of 27.56% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.92%
We cut SG&A while SA invests at 23.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.